Investing In The D-League: Changes Are Needed

Utah Jazz beat writer Ross Siler has long been one of my favoritess and not just because he's one of the few that has taken at least a passing interest in his team's D-League affiliate. Yesterday, Siler suggested it might be time for the Jazz to look at buying the basketball operations of the Utah Flash:

Which raises the question of whether the Jazz will or should take the next step with the Flash. The Jazz have been an affiliate throughout the Flash's three-year existence, with the Flash running the Jazz's system and hiring former Jazz scout Brad Jones as coach. Morris Almond, Kyrylo Fesenko and Kosta Koufos all have played in Orem.

I think, right there, is why it doesn't really make sense for the Jazz to buy the Flash: The Flash already run the Jazz system, have a Jazz coach installed and the NBA club feels comfortable in assigning players to the D-League at will.

The biggest problem, as Siler points out, is that a single-affiliation can't get much better if those things are already in place:

Even though the Houston Rockets are running Rio Grande Valley, they can't keep other NBA teams from signing players off the Vipers' roster. But with the NBA obviously out to encourage as much investment and interest in the D-League as possible, there has been talk of change, though possibly not until the next collective bargaining agreement.

In my opinion, until those changes are made, the hybrid affilation simply isn't as beneficial as it sounds. As luck would have it though, Siler has numerous suggestions/rumors that would improve the system (this means go read his column). My favorite is after the jump.

There's also talk about allowing D-League teams to protect the rights of two or three players who took part in either summer league or went to training camp with one of their NBA affiliates. If he hadn't made the Jazz's roster, Wesley Matthews could have been steered to the Flash that way.

Since typically only the top three players on a D-League team are actually talented enough to play in the NBA, this would be about as ideal as it can get. It would also keep a few more NBA-caliber players stateside, I'd assume, as they'd technically be property of an NBA team if they played in the D-League - meaning a call-up would be potentially be more likely.

Unless the Jazz are anti-Flash owner Brant Andersen, which is a possibility considering he seems to be the polar opposite of the typical way of Jazz thinking, it seems it'll take some sort of changes before they decide to invest in the hybrid system.

Other teams that could benefit?

Are there any other teams you think this could benefit?

Comments

This upcoming CBA will set the course...

For the type of investment in the DLeague…If the owners and players survive going to the nuclear option on the money issues.

The extra $400k that can be taken off expenses is huge for any DLeague ownership group. No issues there.

We already have believers and non-believers in the DLeague system within the NBA. Most of the teams are in the middle – interested but for a variety of reasons (great affliate relationshps already, too cheap, etc) that will get pushed toward a more direct relationship if the reasons are there.

We shall see.

Why not expand the rosters

When the next CBA is negotiated, why not expand the NBA rosters by 2 more players for the last 4 weeks of the season? There could be a special pay scale and NBA teams could get the right of first refusal on the player for the next season. This should be the preferred path for late bloomers and project players to hone their game while learning the NBA style of offense and defense. If players know there is an expansion of NBA rosters at the end of the season, then a higher quality of player will stay here rather than chase bigger oney overseas.

View All Comments
Back to top ↑