Earl Barron Signing With The Bucks Makes Me Wonder About The D-League
I'm back! Coming to you live from the confines of my couch/bed, fresh off of the shutting down of FanHouse and a week-long bout with bronchitis while listening to the musical stylings of David Lee Murphy's Dust On The Bottle. Did you miss me?
Yesterday, Earl Barron announced on Twitter that he was signing a 10-day contract with the Milwaukee Bucks. Awesome for the big fella and well-deserved for a guy that hasn't been able to find a permanent home in the NBA despite solid enough performances in abbreviated stints with both the New York Knicks and Phoenix Suns since starring with the Iowa Energy during the 2009-10 season.
Still, after seeing the news, I was inclined to tweet "So Earl Barron's successfully proven that players that sit at home will get jobs, regardless of dudes trying to get better daily in the D-L."
This isn't spiteful, mean-spirited or anything else from me; It's an observation simply suggesting that some players might be better off hiring a good agent and sitting at home waiting for a phone call rather than playing season after season in the D-League hoping for the ever-elusive call-up.
As my best friend in Europe, Mark Deeks, pointed out on Twitter, "Is the D-League really the place for 29 year olds into their sixth NBA season?" Maybe not, Mr. Deeks. Maybe not. Probably not.
For starters, Barron's game isn't exactly meant for the D-League as I so beautifully illustrated with this post last season. He's a good complementary player that is able to play a role rather well, not a go-to scoring option that's going to do the things he would need to do to standout among the go-to bigs in the Development League.
That said (written?), for Barron to play in the D-League again this season, he would've had to play alongside (or behind) D-League All-Star MVP Courtney Sims; he'd be bound by the D-League's overly-expensive buyout system had an overseas team been interested; and, after averaging 16.2 points and 10.2 rebounds last season, he would've been held to some incredibly high standards that probably wouldn't have been easily upheld considering the amount of talent around him on the Energy (Sims, Othyus Jeffers, Curtis Stinson, Marqus Blakely, Kyle Weaver, Chris Lofton, Stanley Robinson, James Johnson, Gani Lawal, et cetera).
Thinking about this, it made me wonder if the D-League is actually serving its purpose.
"But Scott, you're the D-League's most ardent supporter!" is what you're probably exclaiming.
I know, guys, but the fact that it was easier for Barron to get back to the NBA by not playing in the D-League makes me worry.
Look at big men like Sims, Sean Williams, Patrick O'Bryant and the other bigs with NBAish resumes currently plying their trades and standing out in the D-League without so much as a sniff of an NBA call-up this season. As far as I'm concerned, they're not actually developing -- they are what they are, at this point -- and instead they're just kind of spinning their wheels, waiting for an injury to occur in the NBA. Except, when that injury occurs, its players sitting in the comfort of their own home -- Barron, Jarron Collins, Ike Diogu, Brian Skinner -- and not the players that are playing in the D-League getting those open roster spots.
Apart from longer, if less exciting, NBA careers and names more recognizable -- even if for the wrong reasons -- to the casual NBA fans (we in the biz call this 'experience'), it doesn't really make sense why guys sitting at home are getting multiple looks while players traveling from Bismarck, N.D., to Minneapolis, Minn., to Detroit, Mich., to Portland, Maine and then bussing to Springfield, Mass., the next night while busting their balls for an NBA contract playing night after night in the D-League.
Players in the D-League are, presumably, in game shape; hungry to prove they have what it takes; and more motivated than the guys that know they'll just return to their couches if it doesn't work out rather than a bus on the way to Sioux Falls, S.D.
To me, I guess, all of this is a roundabout way of me deciding that maybe the D-League isn't working. Whether that's because of a perceived lack of talent makes NBA decision makers believe statistics are too inflated to take seriously or something totally above my simple thought process, it seems that many of the players that already are who they're going to be (if that makes any sense) are better off sitting at home rather than playing in the D-League.
I'm open to any other view points on this topic, but to me, it seems that there needs to be some sort of retooling of the D-League before more players opt to go the Earl Barron route instead of the Courtney Sims route. And, of course, this is all assuming that there will be an NBA season next year.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Untapped Potential
That’s the same thing I’m trying to figure out. Since the D-League is all about developing and producing NBA-ready talent, then why are teams quick to sign “veterans”. In my opinion, I believe that there is an abundance of talent in the D-League, just anticipating that ever sought after call-up. The teams will start to understand the usefulness of the league after they start implementing the D-League as it was meant to be. Give the D-League a chance, you never know. It could be the right situation and the player could stick around for the season. Untapped potential is how I see it.
Dr. Smoove
by Adrienne Yancey on Mar 2, 2025 11:36 AM EST reply actions
I think
the best way to retool the D-League is to expand to the point where every team at owns a portion of a team.
OKC and San Antonio use the 66ers and the Toros pretty consistently (Latavious Williams, Larry Owens, etc).
I say this because my Bulls have used the Energy I think once in the past three seasons, and that was when James Johnson asked to be sent down.
Then again, I’m not sure if a 30 team League is really viable at this point.
Anarchist. Misanthrope. Beard aficionado.
by Cosmis on Mar 2, 2025 1:11 PM EST reply actions
You have to move to a 1:1 relationship between teams and their NBA affliliates,
so that the NBA team has some control over how players are developed in the minor league. Once that happens, we’ll also see more players, even high picks like Thabeet, going down for seasoning, and the team doing the call-up will know the talent well enough to trust unproven examples of it.
At some point a team is going to break out with a single player from the D-league ranks, get an actual star out of someone they’ve invested a little of their own time and money in, and then it’ll dawn on NBA ownership that they’ve been eating the seed corn.
(It’s a shame that the CBA thing is going to probably neglect this for another round. “Eating the seed corn” happens more often than not when you’re engaged in scorched-earth negotiations, I imagine.)
"Those things about which we cannot theorize, we must narrate." – Umberto Eco
by feral on Mar 3, 2025 10:23 AM EST up reply actions
I'm all for a 1:1 relationship between D-League teams and NBA teams
I’m just certain that it’ll take a while to do.
You’re absolutely right about needing a D-League grown star. I was hoping that Aaron Brooks MIP campaign last season would be the catapult to stardom in this league, but it appears I was mistaken.
We just have to hope Othyus Jeffers or Courtney Sims or someone manages to become a mid-level star in this league to go along with AB. There’s too much talent for it not to happen soon enough.
Anarchist. Misanthrope. Beard aficionado.
by Cosmis on Mar 3, 2025 6:52 PM EST up reply actions
Reggie Williams.
I write about basketball players with Ridiculous Upside. I know you'll love it.
by Scott Schroeder on Mar 3, 2025 7:22 PM EST up reply actions
Anthony Tollive.r
;-)
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
by Omaha Sun on Mar 3, 2025 8:19 PM EST up reply actions
He's doing just fine, isn't he?
Unfortunately my hapless Wolves don’t develop d-league talent. They sign other teams’ finds, after those players go off for 30+ in meaningless late-season games against Minnesota.
"Those things about which we cannot theorize, we must narrate." – Umberto Eco
by feral on Mar 4, 2025 7:51 AM EST up reply actions
And at a higher salary.
I write about basketball players with Ridiculous Upside. I know you'll love it.
by Scott Schroeder on Mar 4, 2025 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
It's only right.
"Those things about which we cannot theorize, we must narrate." – Umberto Eco
by feral on Mar 6, 2025 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
I said "mid-level"
not “going to be the best player in the league within the next three years.”
#Reggie
Anarchist. Misanthrope. Beard aficionado.
by Cosmis on Mar 4, 2025 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
I like
that idea and feel the same way. Because even though my Suns used the D-League this year, I feel in the past they haven’t utilized the system as much as they could have.
Dr. Smoove
by Adrienne Yancey on Mar 2, 2025 1:29 PM EST reply actions
Another Suns fan? Cool.
We pobably haven’t used the D-League because we seem to have traded away most of our draft picks this decade. The guys we use the D-League on are guys that the team never really had plans for It seems (Griffin, Tucker). Goran Dragic and Robin Lopez probably would have benefited from a few stretches in the D-League as rookies. Too bad Gani got hurt because i think another stint with the Energy would have been good for him.
You must be right Scott. Earl Barron shot 23% with the Suns. He was absolutley pathetic. Looking bck on the Barron era makes me appreciate Gortat that much more.
The D-League may not be fulfilling it’s purpose as a whole, but it is providing Booker Woodfox with a job in the US. It’s much easier to follow him than it is Justin Carter in Slovakia. :-D
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
by Omaha Sun on Mar 2, 2025 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
Yep. Another die-hard Suns fan.
But anyway, at first I didn’t like how we traded away all our draft picks earlier this decade, but in the end I see that it has kind of worked out in our favor. We have Gortat, who we originally had drafted, who now seems like a God send. And after seeing Dowdell for the past couple of summers with our team, and seeing how well he performed in Dragic’s absence, I believe he should receive increased playing time. Lastly, after watching Lawal in the D-League, I see a good amount of potential that is just waiting to be shown off, but due to his unfortunate season-ending injury, I’ll have to wait a little longer to see the results pay off.
Dr. Smoove
by Adrienne Yancey on Mar 2, 2025 5:45 PM EST reply actions
Dowdell is an OK player who earned his roster spot,
but he’s not at Aaron Brook’s level.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
by Omaha Sun on Mar 2, 2025 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
Remember
many are forsaking money from Euro leagues for a shot in the NBA. It may be that scouting in the D-League is not very prevalent, except for a few teams like the Spurs, but they search far and wide for steals. In the new CBA, if a player isn’t playing for more than 10 games to coach’s decision, he should be automatically sent down for a 4 game stint. Maybe then scouts would tag along to see.
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"- Qui-Gon Jinn
by tomkanti on Mar 2, 2025 7:53 PM EST reply actions
The Spurs are also an organization that owns its own D-league team outright.
Somehow the rest of the NBA sees them doing the right developmental stuff and decides it’s not a good example to follow. They’d rather sign mediocrities to twice the contracts they deserve (Charlie Villanueva, $8 million a year) than spend a fraction of that on “the minors.”
"Those things about which we cannot theorize, we must narrate." – Umberto Eco
by feral on Mar 3, 2025 10:26 AM EST up reply actions

by Scott Schroeder on 








